Insurance Commissioner Jones Highlights 2011 Important Achievements

Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones marked his first full year in office this week by looking back on the California Department of Insurance’s (CDI) major accomplishments during 2011.  Some of these achievements were very important for insurance consumers.  Here’s what his press release said:

“A little over a year ago, I took my oath as Insurance Commissioner and pledged to make my Administration one of action,” Commissioner Jones said. “I can confidently and proudly say that the Department has fully lived up to that pledge. We have achieved a number of critical successes on behalf of California’s consumers consistent with our vision to be the most effective consumer protection agency in the nation.”

Continue Reading

Insurer Claims Practices Attacked In Revealing Huffington Post Article

The insurance industry is unique in California and in most states: unlike other industries, it is required to act in good faith (known as the covenant of good faith and fair dealing) with its insured customers.  The California courts have long held that insurers have a special relationship, in the nature of a fiduciary relationship, that requires them to act with regards to their interests in a manner equal to the interests of their policyholders.

The Huffington Post, in a very interesting article entitled, “Insurance Claim Delays Deliver Massive Profits To Industry By Shorting Customers” reports that since the mid-1990s, “a new profit-hungry model, combined with weak regulation, has upended that ancient social contract” between insurers and claimants. 

Continue Reading

MCKENNON |SCHINDLER LLP OBTAINS $3.93 MILLION DAMAGE AWARD FOR CLIENTS IN BUSINESS DISPUTE OVER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND LICENSING RIGHTS

In January 2010, McKennon | Schindler was approached by weight loss supplement company TriPharma, LLC, about a dispute involving its exclusive rights to advertise, market and sell a revolutionary patented and clinically studied weight loss product that was manufactured by San Diego based company Imagenetix, Inc.  TriPharma discovered Imagenetix’s multiple breaches of its exclusive license agreement with Imagenetix which had all but destroyed its ability to sell its weight loss product, destroyed much of the goodwill built up for the product, and was threatening to destroy the years of hard work put in developing TriPharma’s one-of-a-kind weight loss beverage, which was due to hit the stores in a few short months.  Shortly thereafter, Imagenetix wrongfully terminated TriPharma’s exclusive license and began to sell product directly to TriPharma’s customers. 

The attorneys at McKennon | Schindler LLP took immediate action and filed lawsuits in federal court against the companies which were infringing on TriPharma’s exclusive license through product sales of their own, and filed claims in JAMS arbitration against Imagenetix for, among other things, fraud, breach of contract, and injunctive relief, seeking damages as well as reinstatement of the exclusive license agreement

Continue Reading

McKENNON|SCHINDLER WINS DEFENSE VERDICT AGAINST $2 MILLION SUCCESSOR LIABLITY CLAIM

On October 12, 2011, the McKennon | Schindler law firm won a complete defense verdict on a $2 million successor liability claim against their client, Elephant Talk Communications Corp., in a case called Chong Hing Bank Limited v. Elephant Talk Communications, Inc., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2009-00328467. 

Chong Hing Bank Limited (Bank), a Hong Kong financial services company, began making loans to Elephant Talk Limited (ETL), a Hong Kong telecommunications company, beginning in 1996.  In 2002 ETL reverse acquired a California public shell company called Staruni Corp. in a stock-for-stock exchange in which Staruni became the parent company and ETL became its wholly-owned subsidiary.  Staruni changed its name to “Elephant Talk Communications, Inc.” (Elephant Talk) in connection with the reverse acquisition.

Continue Reading

Boon or Bust for Employee Rights Under ERISA Plans?

The Thursday June 3, 2011 edition of the Los Angeles Daily Journal featured Robert McKennon's article entitled "Boon or Bust for Employee Rights Under ERISA Plans?" In it, Mr. McKennon discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark May 16, 2011 opinion in Cigna Corp. v. Amara, 563 U. S. ____ (2011).  The article is posted below with permission of Daily Journal Corp. (2011).


Fighting An Insurance Claim Denial Will Often Pay Off

It will not be surprising to many readers of this blog that insurance companies often deny life insurance, health insurance and disability insurance claims.  Many times, insurance companies are wrong in their decisions.   And, sometimes they acknowledge their mistakes.  The question becomes: what are the odds of an insurance company changing its mind and reversing the decision?  Our firm knows firsthand that the odds are extremely good when a reputable and respected law firm is involved in representing the policyholder’s interests.  But that is just our experience.  What is the overall experience when a health insurance claim is denied and a subsequent appeal is filed?  We now have our answer. 

In his article entitled “Don’t take a health insurer’s rejection as the final word on your medical claim,” Tom Murphy of the Associated Press cites a recent report from the Government Accountability Office which found that overall, appeals have an approximately 50% success rate.  The article lists a number of actions policyholders can take to increase the likelihood of success on appeal.  Murphy mentions obtaining and submitting copies of the entire medical file, enlisting a treating doctor to write letters explaining the policyholder’s relevant medical history, understanding policy language, writing a detailed letter with supporting records and information and complying with all deadlines.

Continue Reading

The Waiver Doctrine, Alive And Well in ERISA Cases

The Wednesday August 11, 2010 edition of the Los Angeles Daily Journal featured my article, entitled “The Waiver Doctrine, Alive And Well in ERISA Cases,” in the Perspective column. It explains a very recent case from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Mitchell v. CB Richard Ellis Long Term Disability Plan, 2010 DJDAR 11532 (9th Cir. July 26).  The article is posted below with permission of Daily Journal Corp. (2010). 

The Waiver Doctrine, Alive And Well in ERISA Cases

Accidental Injury vs. Sickness Provisions in Disability Policies

Robert McKennon and Jenny Wang authored a DRI publication entitled Accidental Injury vs. Sickness Provisions in Disability Policies in September 2009.